A Car for the DIY Enthusiast
A car for the do-it-yourselfer, good for experiments and modifications. Cheap to buy, you just need to find a good example, and it will last for a long time.
Model and generation reliability insights from verified owners. Variants are selected when adding reviews.
No affected parts have been reported yet.
| Engine | Score | Reports | Common issues |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.4 (62 Hp) | No reports | 0 | No issues reported |
A car for the do-it-yourselfer, good for experiments and modifications. Cheap to buy, you just need to find a good example, and it will last for a long time.
I only have bad associations. If I didn't have the 1991 model, maybe I would think positively about the new one, but I can't because the problems with the old one don't let me forget.
A car for little money. Super soft suspension, perfect for Polish roads - you don't even need to brake for speed bumps. The engine doesn't jerk at low RPMs when accelerating.
I do not recommend this car. Everything breaks, and at the most unexpected moments. You constantly have to tinker in the garage just to keep it running somehow.
Driving this car is quite pleasant (especially the wagon, which is very practical). However, frequent minor breakdowns are life-ruining. This car is for the garage tinkerer. I've learned so much from doing my own repairs that I could work in a service center. After buying a 6-year-old Renault 19, I have nothing to do in the garage. It was a good Renault 12, desecrated by the Romanians, and I sold it to them at the market 3 years ago.
This car is typically for the countryside!!!!! I do not recommend it! It's a mistake! Even models from '91 are okay, but those from '96 are a MISTAKE! I was fooled and bought it new, and I regret it!!!! My money was wasted! I'm selling this old thing even for 2500!
I have a great sentiment for this car. I learned to drive on it and covered over 320,000 km. Currently, I drive a Toyota Previa, and it's night and day in comparison. However, if I had to choose between a Dacia, Polonez, and a Fiat 126p, I would pick the Dacia. I've driven both a Polonez and a Fiat 126p. The Dacia is more dynamic and comfortable. Reliability is at a similar level.
I own the 2-door Sport version. The car is very nice and well-maintained because it has low mileage --> LOOK AT THE MILEAGE <-- it's so low that the car has only had bodywork repairs 3 times, and it drives. The engine and body are in good condition! I recommend this car; it is truly super. If you find a well-maintained example, it's really a super car!
Overall, I gave it a good rating, considering the tech level of this car. I was disappointed with the rear springs; I thought station wagons had stronger springs. Another minus is oil consumption, the scraper ring sticks, and about 150 ml of oil needs to be added per 1000 km. This is not cylinder wear, as compression is good. It starts on LPG down to -12°C (BRC system). The problem is the lack of gasoline supply; the pump failed, it was too old. This will happen to anyone who drives on LPG and...
A very fuel-efficient and attractive car. It's also inexpensive and durable, built with good Renault quality. I highly recommend this car (Dacia). I have the Sport version, and it performs exceptionally well. It has 265,017 km, which I think is not a lot. The car is in excellent condition, no accidents, no scratches because it's kept in a garage. It only has one dent on the rear right fender from a small car parking next to me and hitting my right side with its chrome bumper. The other driver paid for repairs. Looking for an inexpensive way to fix it so it looks good.
Alternative comparisons will appear here soon.
Add your email-verified report to help other Dacia 1410 owners.